S. H. DEITCH v. BIER | 460 Pa. 394 | Pa. | Judgment | Law ...
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/59149600add7b049345d9625
In the instant case, the changes in the immediate neighborhood do not as a matter of law necessitate the non-enforcement of the restrictive covenant, but such a change is a relevant and a material fact which should have been considered by the chancellor in determining the enforceability of the covenant. See Schulman v.Serrill, 432 Pa. 206, 246 A.2d 643 (1968); Price v.
DA: 29 PA: 27 MOZ Rank: 20